🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up buttressing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist included several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder version led Russian media and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it might seek to question.